Skip to content
Opt Dir

Glossary ยท approach

Robust Optimization

Mathematical optimization approach that models uncertain parameters with an uncertainty set rather than a probability distribution, and seeks solutions that remain feasible against the worst-case realisation within that set.

ROWorst-Case OptimizationSet-Based Uncertainty OptimizationAdjustable Robust OptimizationBudgeted Uncertainty Model
Robust optimization addresses settings where the probability distribution of uncertain parameters is unknown or unreliable, by assuming the parameters can take any value within an uncertainty set U and seeking a solution that remains feasible under the worst case. The first formulation, due to Soyster (1973), uses a box uncertainty set and produces highly conservative solutions. Ben-Tal and Nemirovski (1998, 1999, 2000) introduced ellipsoidal uncertainty sets, which balance conservatism and performance and reduce to second-order cone programs (SOCP). Bertsimas and Sim (2003, 2004) proposed budgeted uncertainty, in which at most ฮ“ parameters per constraint simultaneously attain their worst values; the resulting model is an LP of the same size as the nominal LP and is the most widely deployed variant in practice. Adjustable robust optimization (Ben-Tal Goryashko Guslitzer Nemirovski 2004) lets second-stage decisions adapt to the realised uncertainty, commonly via affine decision rules. Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) optimizes the worst-case expectation over a family of distributions, bridging stochastic and robust paradigms. Compared with stochastic programming, robust optimization needs no distribution information, but tends to be more conservative. References: Ben-Tal El Ghaoui Nemirovski (2009), Bertsimas Brown Caramanis (2011).
ร–rnek

A textile firm splits raw-material orders among three suppliers whose unit prices may vary by plus or minus 15 percent with no available distribution. A budgeted (Bertsimas-Sim) model with ฮ“ = 2 assumes that at most two suppliers simultaneously hit their worst price; the solution allocates 45 / 35 / 20 percent across the three suppliers instead of single-sourcing. Nominal cost rises 3 percent, but the worst-case cost falls 18 percent, giving the firm a balance-sheet-protective procurement portfolio against price shocks.

Esc Close